Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matteo Trevisan vs Juan-Martin Aranguren Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Trevisan vs Aranguren analysis and find out who is favored!
Matteo Trevisan vs Juan-Martin Aranguren Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Trevisan 1 - 0 Aranguren
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Trevisan has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Aranguren has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Trevisan, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Aranguren has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Trevisan has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Aranguren has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Trevisan has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Aranguren winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Trevisan has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 19/ 12), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 6/ 10). Aranguren has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 394/ 242), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Trevisan winning 1 times and Aranguren being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Trevisan winning 2 and Aranguren winning 0. The last match between Trevisan and Aranguren was at the Italy F9, 20-05-2013, First, Clay with Matteo Trevisan getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Trevisan and Aranguren have played a deciding set 0 times, with Trevisan winning 0 times and Aranguren 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Trevisan winning 0, and Aranguren 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Trevisan has played against opponents with an average rank of while Aranguren has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Trevisan has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Aranguren has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Trevisan has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Aranguren has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
267
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
184
High
40
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
58% (220-159)
Career Total W/L
61% (400-252)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$6,640
Career Prize Money
$8,930
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Matteo Trevisan | Juan-Martin Aranguren |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matteo Trevisan | Juan-Martin Aranguren |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Matteo Trevisan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Igor Smilansky
Player
Matteo Trevisan
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Trevisan
Player
Tommaso Metti
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
0
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Igor Sijsling
Player
Matteo Trevisan
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
84%
(
87 of
104)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Trevisan
Player
Walter Trusendi
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Goncalo Falcao
Player
Matteo Trevisan
53%
(
45 of
85)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianluca Di Nicola
Player
Matteo Trevisan
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
21%
(
5 of
24)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Matteo Trevisan
Player
Hugo Grenier
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Matteo Trevisan
Player
Alessandro Bega
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Trevisan
Player
Edward Corrie
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
7
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(3) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Trevisan
Player
Antonio Massara
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
70 of
107)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
107)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Juan-Martin Aranguren Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Rogerio Dutra Da Silva
Player
Juan-Martin Aranguren
87%
(
76 of
87)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
11
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
18%
(
2 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
71%
(
10 of
14)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
51%
(
44 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
55 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan-Martin Aranguren
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
16 of
21)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan-Martin Aranguren
Player
Goran Tosic
76%
(
59 of
78)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
46%
(
36 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Juan-Martin Aranguren
Player
Tomas Buchhass
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan-Martin Aranguren
Player
Luciano Doria
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
8 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Alund
Player
Juan-Martin Aranguren
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Trevisan Vs Aranguren Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
